Popular
Data Science
Technology
Finance
Management
Future Tech
Java is a popular programming language used by large enterprises and companies to build their software. Sorting is a common task for any software we are building, like sorting a list, numbers, etc. Java is an object-oriented programming language that uses the concepts of classes and objects. Java has robust ordering and sorting features that simplify data management and manipulation. Comparable and Comparator, Java’s two main interfaces, are crucial resources for creating unique sorting logic.
In this article, we will learn the difference between the comparable and comparator interfaces in Java, like how they differ in sorting, their methods, and how to apply these concepts in real-world examples.
Comparable Interface is a member of the Java Collections framework which defines the natural ordering of the objects of each class that implements it. It is a part of java.lang package of Java. Comparables are used to sort things by default or natural ordering, which occurs when an object knows how it should be arranged.
The compareTo() method, which specifies how instances of that class should be compared, must be overridden by a class that implements the Comparable interface. The Comparable interface allows you to compare one object to another of the same type. Several Java built-in classes, such as Double, String, and Integer, implement the Comparable interface.
The syntax of a comparable interface consists of a parameter T. T refers to the type parameter and contains the type of objects that this object may be compared to.
A class must override the compareTo method to implement the Comparable interface. The objects’ natural order will be determined using this interface. Let’s consider an example, where we have a Car class and we want to sort the car according to their model year. To do this sorting, we will implement the Comparable<Car> and override the compareTo() method of this interface.
Example Code:
Output:
Explanation:
In this example, the compareTo method compares cars according to their manufacturing year. This means that when a list of Car objects is sorted, they will be ordered by their years in ascending order, and then will be printed accordingly. By using the expression this.year – other.year, we’re effectively implementing the logic as follows:
A comparable interface only has one method i.e., compareTo(T o). Let’s see the method details:
The compareTo method returns:
Parameters:
Throws:
The Comparable interface defines and helps maintain the natural order of objects which was not possible using the Arrays.sort() or Collections.sort() in Java. There are some limitations of the Comparable interface also, which need to be understood to have a better idea:
Also Check: Java Tutorial for Beginners
A comparison function that places an overall order on a group of things. To have exact control over the sort order, comparators can be provided to a sort method (like Collections.sort or Arrays.sort). Comparators can also be used to give an ordering for collections of items that lack a natural ordering or to regulate the order of specific data structures (like sorted sets or sorted maps).
Multiple sorting sequences, or sorting objects based on multiple data members, are provided by comparators. The java.util package contains the Comparator functional interface, which is used to sort objects in Java. An interface with just one abstract method is called a functional interface and this is known as a Single Abstract Method (SAM) Interface.
The syntax of a Comparator interface consists of a parameter T. T refers to the type parameter and contains the type of objects that may be compared by this comparator.
The compare method returns:
There are two ways to sort objects using the comparator interface in Java.
To implement the comparator interface for sorting we can use a separate comparator class which is ideal for situations when you need to apply standard, reusable sorting logic in several different locations.
Syntax:
Example Code 1:
Output:
Explanation:
In this example, we have used a separate comparator class to compare and sort the Car class objects according to their name. To compare two Car objects by name, the CarNameComparator class overrides the compare method and implements the Comparator<Car> interface.
This method neatly isolates the sorting logic from the rest of the code, which makes it very helpful when you require a reusable comparator across several application components. Because the comparison logic is contained in a single class, it is also easy to test and alter apart from the application code, which improves maintainability.
Example Code 2:
Output:
Explanation:
In this example, we have used a separate comparator class to compare and sort the Car class objects according to their year. To compare two Car objects by year, the CarYearComparator class overrides the compare method and implements the Comparator<Car> interface.
This method neatly isolates the sorting logic from the rest of the code, which makes it very helpful when you require a reusable comparator across several application components. Because the comparison logic is contained in a single class, it is also easy to test and alter apart from the application code, which improves maintainability.
2. Using an Inline Comparator with a Lambda Expression
To implement the comparator interface for sorting we can also use a lambda expression which is Ideal for context-specific, inline sorting, and particularly when you need quick & straightforward sorting logic.
Syntax:
Example Code 1:
Output:
Explanation:
In this example, we have used an inline comparator using a lambda expression comparator to compare and sort the Car class objects according to their year. Here, we have created the comparator directly as inline to compare the Car class objects by their year.
A comparator interface only has various methods and they are as follows:
Parameters:
2. boolean equals(Object o): This method determines if an object is “equal to” this comparator or not. Only if the given object imposes the same ordering as this comparator and is also a comparator can this function return true.
Parameters:
3. Comparator comparing(Function keyExtractor): This method creates a comparator using a given keyExtractor function as a basis.
Parameters:
1. default Comparator<T> thenComparing(Comparator<? super T> other)
This method returns a comparator in lexicographic order together with another comparator. When two components are deemed equal by this Comparator, i.e., compare(a, b) == 0, the other is utilised to establish the order.
Parameters:
2. naturalOrder(T):
This method provides a comparator that performs a natural order comparison of comparable objects.
Parameters:
The Comparator interface does provide more flexibility than the comparable interface, but still, there are some limitations of it, and need to be understood to have a better idea:
Using Comparator brings in the additional burden of writing extra code whenever you want to sort objects by different orders. For multiple sorting tasks, you need multiple comparator implementations. For instance, If we are sorting a list of students by their roll_name followed by date of birth, and marks, then for each criterion, we would need separate comparators – thus increasing the complexity of our code.
Custom comparators can introduce a performance overhead, particularly if their implementation is not trivial in terms of just one field. In the past, this could worry you a lot about performance-critical applications processing large datasets.
For example, a comparator that compares multiple fields of a Car class (e.g., sorting by name, then by year, and then by chassis number) can be less inefficient than a single comparison.
Although chaining comparators like thenComparing together is very powerful, it can introduce more complexity and the possibility of mistakes, when you’re not careful working with null values or comparison logic that’s not consistent with the ordering. For example, Chaining Comparators, if one of the Comparators does not deal with null values properly then it can lead to a NullPointerException or results of sorting being wrong.
It is more difficult to debug custom comparators, especially when using complex chaining or lambda expression than it is when implementing the Comparable interface. For example, if a comparator chain does not work as expected, it can be quite hard to identify the issue within the comparison chain.
The Comparable and Comparator interfaces are the two main methods available to you when sorting objects in Java. Selecting the best method for your requirements can be made easier if you are aware of the differences between these two interfaces.
Key differences between the Comparable and Comparator Interfaces in Java:
Basis | Comparable Interface | Comparator Interface |
Definition | A Comparable interface is defined in a separate class. | A Comparator interface is defined inline within a method or expression. |
Length of Code | The code length for using the comparable interface is longer due to the presence of a dedicated class. | The code length for using the comparator interface is concise and shorter compared to the comparable interface. |
Package | The Comparable interface is a part of java.lang package. | The Comparator interface is a part of java.util package. |
Type | A Comparable interface is a normal interface in Java. | A Comparator interface is a functional interface in Java. |
Readability | The code of comparable is more readable due to the clear separation of logic. | The code of the comparator interface is also readable. |
Reusability | It is not reusable for different sorting criteria. | It is highly reusable for different sorting. |
Flexibility | A comparable interface can define only one sort order. | A comparator interface can define only multiple sort orders. |
Nature of Sorting | It is used for the natural sorting of objects. | It is used for the natural sorting of objects. |
Method to Implement | compareTo(T o) method | compare(T o1, T o2) method |
Modification Requirement | Comparable must be implemented by the class itself. | There is no need to change the class in any way. |
Implementation Location | It is implemented within the class. | It is generally in a different class. |
Compatibility | Less adaptable; adjusting the sorting order would require changing the class. | More adaptable because you can alter the sorting order without changing the class. |
Primary Method Purpose | It defines the default order of objects. | It allows custom sorting based on different criteria. |
Multiple Criteria Sorting | Multiple criteria sorting is not possible without changing the class. | It is possible by creating multiple comparators. |
Use case | The use cases are default sorting like String, Integer, etc. | The use cases are custom sorting like sorting by different fields. |
Syntax | Simpler, as it’s integrated into the class. | More verbose, requiring a separate comparator class or lambda expression. |
Sorting Sequence | It is used for the default or natural ordering of objects in a class. | It is used for custom ordering of objects in a class. |
The size of the collection and the intricacy of the sorting logic determine how effective sorting algorithms are. TimSort is a hybrid sorting algorithm used by Java that is generally efficient. It is derived from merge sort and insertion sort.
Complexity of Time:
When multiple comparators are used or in chained comparisons, ensure that the sort order is stable. A stable sort will keep the order of those items that have equal keys.
If a class has a natural ordering, then it should implement the Comparable interface. This allows objects of the class to be used as keys or values in a sorted map or entries in a sorted set.
Use methods like Comparator.nullsFirst and Comparator.nullsLast to gracefully handle null values in comparisons, ensure robustness, and avoid runtime exceptions.
While creating common comparators, use static factory methods provided by Comparator such as Comparator.comparing. This will enhance readability and reduce boilerplate.
Reuse or define comparators in advance rather than constructing them inline in multiple places. This improves code maintainability and reduces redundancy.
Ensure a clear alignment of the logic of the comparator with the equals method. If two objects are equal per the comparator, they should also be equal according to the equals method.
Comparators that have complicated sorting criteria, favour readability over complex comparisons. This helps in understanding and later modifying such code.
For complex sorting logic, if need be, use well-named methods or separate comparator classes to make it more readable. This will allow others to understand the sorting logic while easily going through it.
Consider the comparator in terms of performance issues, especially with large datasets. Well-implemented comparators can help achieve a lot in sort performance.
If you are chaining comparators using thenComparing method, ensure that each one plays a significant role in the complete sorting criteria. Redundant or conflicting logic should be kept away.
This article covers the differences between Comparable and Comparator interfaces in Java. Comparing when to use which interfaces depends, like Comparable is best used when there is a need for natural ordering that makes sense in the majority of use cases. Comparators, on the other hand, are helpful when a class lacks a natural ordering or when several sorting orders are required since they offer flexibility in sorting by multiple criteria.
To get a better understanding while learning these concepts, try implementing both the Comparable and Comparator interfaces in Java programs. Gaining proficiency with these interfaces will improve your productivity as a Java developer, regardless of the task at hand – sorting basic lists, interacting with complex data structures, or managing large datasets.
The DevOps Playbook
Simplify deployment with Docker containers.
Streamline development with modern practices.
Enhance efficiency with automated workflows.
Popular
Data Science
Technology
Finance
Management
Future Tech
Accelerator Program in Business Analytics & Data Science
Integrated Program in Data Science, AI and ML
Certificate Program in Full Stack Development with Specialization for Web and Mobile
Certificate Program in DevOps and Cloud Engineering
Certificate Program in Application Development
Certificate Program in Cybersecurity Essentials & Risk Assessment
Integrated Program in Finance and Financial Technologies
Certificate Program in Financial Analysis, Valuation and Risk Management
© 2024 Hero Vired. All rights reserved